Sunday, 27 November 2011

Graffiti Argument

Introduction
Some People believe that Graffiti is art and not art.
Graffiti is Art because….
Well Graffiti is art because they draw pictures and words. Graffiti is art because some are appropriate to see in public. Plus they don’t do it in mean ways. Also….. Graffiti is art because they can tell stories and there is a lot of good ways of doing it. And they do it bye using spray cans to do it which is part of art. Right?
Graffiti is not art because…..
Graffiti is not art because it can be inappropriate and they can do it in mean ways to people. Along with this. Graffiti is not art because they can do vandalism. Graffiti is not art because it can destroy property. Art is never so post to destroy property.
Now I believe that Graffiti is art because when someone is doing Graffiti they have a true passion about it and there the ones that decide if its art or not. I Also Believe that Graffiti is art because it’s a way to share and express things to public or it can be personal. I believe that Graffiti is Art because people love to do it and they say that it is art
Conclusion
After considering both sides. I believe that Graffiti is Art

No comments:

Post a Comment